<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doing Your Identity Homework</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wandco.com/67/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wandco.com/67</link>
	<description>A small personal design firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:12:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DK Holland</title>
		<link>http://www.wandco.com/67/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>DK Holland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wandco.com/?p=67#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Are you picking up on that little pimple next to the Q in the new Quark logo? 

It may a R - which would meean that they have been able to register their trademark -  their new Q - which could mean the Scottish Arts guys might be out of luck in terms of putting dibs on their mark in the US.

Or it could be the pimple is a TM which anyone can use on bit of interstate commerce in which case the Scottish guys should sit up and take notice - the same as the Nebraska ETV Neetwork guys did when NBC designed their short lived, ill fated N in the mid 70s:

On New Year&#039;s Day 1976, NBC proudly unveiled a new, modern &quot;N&quot; logo that had been developed and unveiled at a staggering cost of more than $600,000.

&quot;The problem was that many viewers in Nebraska - including NETV program director Ron Hull, watching the Tournament of Roses parade - thought the logo looked just a tad familiar. As it turned out, NBC&#039;s big-budget graphics team had come up with a design identical to the logo used by Nebraska&#039;s ETV Network. Oddly, not only had NETV paid only $100 to the designer of their logo, but they weren&#039;t even particularly happy with it.

They settled this by NBC giving them about $1 million worth of TV equipment. An expensive logo, eh?&quot;  source: www.tommcmahon.net

DKTM Holland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you picking up on that little pimple next to the Q in the new Quark logo? </p>
<p>It may a R &#8211; which would meean that they have been able to register their trademark &#8211;  their new Q &#8211; which could mean the Scottish Arts guys might be out of luck in terms of putting dibs on their mark in the US.</p>
<p>Or it could be the pimple is a TM which anyone can use on bit of interstate commerce in which case the Scottish guys should sit up and take notice &#8211; the same as the Nebraska ETV Neetwork guys did when NBC designed their short lived, ill fated N in the mid 70s:</p>
<p>On New Year&#8217;s Day 1976, NBC proudly unveiled a new, modern &#8220;N&#8221; logo that had been developed and unveiled at a staggering cost of more than $600,000.</p>
<p>&#8220;The problem was that many viewers in Nebraska &#8211; including NETV program director Ron Hull, watching the Tournament of Roses parade &#8211; thought the logo looked just a tad familiar. As it turned out, NBC&#8217;s big-budget graphics team had come up with a design identical to the logo used by Nebraska&#8217;s ETV Network. Oddly, not only had NETV paid only $100 to the designer of their logo, but they weren&#8217;t even particularly happy with it.</p>
<p>They settled this by NBC giving them about $1 million worth of TV equipment. An expensive logo, eh?&#8221;  source: <a href="http://www.tommcmahon.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.tommcmahon.net</a></p>
<p>DKTM Holland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
